The significance of the passage of time, to quote our esteemed Vice President
Kamala Harris
, is that it takes the urgency out of even the most despicable actions. The Durham report, for example, coming so long after the corruption occurred, was readily dismissed as a nothingburger by the legacy
media
that easily convinced viewers it no longer mattered.
But the fact remains that the Democrats’ full-court press to frame former President
Donald Trump
as an agent of Russia was the most egregious and consequential political dirty trick in modern memory. Going well beyond a smear campaign, it was an all-hands-on-deck offensive that we now know reached all the way to then-President Barack Obama, then-Vice President Joe Biden, and other top-ranking administration officials.
WHO’S IN, WHO’S OUT, AND WHO’S STILL WAITING TO ANNOUNCE FOR SENATE IN 2024
But none of it would have been possible if journalists hadn’t abandoned all pretense of objectivity and willingly hopped on the bandwagon to trumpet the FBI’s malicious and false narrative that Trump was working with the Kremlin to win the presidency. As the story grew bigger and bigger, our corrupt corporate media amplified the Left’s propaganda and ridiculed Trump’s accusations that he’d been framed. The media are thoroughly complicit.
In May 2020, long before we even knew about Hunter Biden’s laptop, then-President Trump pointed to the extraordinary actions taken by top-ranking Obama administration officials during the Russia investigation and repeatedly accused Obama himself of being in on the “crime.”
Here’s what passed for “journalism” at that time. Politico writer Jack Shafer penned an
op-ed
titled, “How Not to Listen to Donald Trump.” According to this so-called journalist, “Until the president comes up with actual evidence for his allegations, we’re under no obligation to pay attention.” He accused Trump of filling the “air with the ack-ack of disinformation and misdirection, needlessly alarming the public and sending reporters on wild goose chases to either confirm or disprove his allegations.”
Shafer continued, “Now it could be that Obama did commit the biggest political crime in the history of the USA. If there’s a shred of evidence, I want Obama investigated. If the investigation bears fruit, I want him to have a fair trial. If he’s found guilty, I want him punished. But show me that shred of evidence first or I’m going back to bed.”
The evidence was overwhelming, but Shafer dutifully pulled the covers over his head anyway and slept through the political scandal of the century. Being the hard-hitting investigative journalist that he was, he declared Trump had “forfeited the automatic right to our investigative attention.” And finally, he advised colleagues not to be “dupe[s]” and to “use just one ear.”
At the same time, the far-left Tom Nichols, a writer for the Atlantic,
tweeted
: “The Trump people are going to unleash a blizzard of bulls***, including selective releases and declassifications and leaks, and if the media chases every one of these as bombshell[s], they’re going to end up being a functioning arm of the Trump campaign.”
Had Shafer, Nichols, or any of the other ethically depraved members of the press grasped that they themselves had morphed into a functioning arm of the Biden campaign? It’s their job to report the news objectively, a responsibility they have collectively abdicated.
But the Russia hoax was just the start. The Democratic Party, which now counts permanent Washington and the media among its members, were amateurs in 2016. Perhaps that’s why Trump won the election. However, by the time of the 2020 election, they’d upped their game considerably.
The “Twitter Files” revealed that an unholy alliance between the Democratic Party, the FBI, Big Tech, and the media worked together toward a Biden victory. These entities abused their power to achieve a common goal: the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story. The revelations about Twitter’s inside dealings with the FBI exposed a concerted effort to manipulate the free flow of information to voters ahead of a critical election.
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley recently concluded that the legacy media in the United States now resembles the state media of China or any other totalitarian nation. And he is right.
The purpose of a free press is to hold the government accountable for its actions.
According to
the ACLU, “free media functions as a watchdog that can investigate and report on government wrongdoing.”
How far the media elite have fallen from those lofty ideals.
One particularly astute liberal writer, the Nation’s Patrick Lawrence, understood what was happening early on. In February 2017, shortly after Gen. Michael Flynn’s resignation as Trump’s national security adviser, Lawrence
wrote
: “You have studied the Enlightenment? Good: You know what I mean when I say we are headed into the Endarkenment. The lights upon us are dimming. We have been more or less abandoned by a press that proves incapable of informing us in anything approaching a disinterested fashion. As suggested, either the media are Clintonian liberals before they are newspapers and broadcasters, or they are servants of power before they serve us.”
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Elizabeth Stauffer is a contributor to the Washington Examiner, Power Line, the Western Journal, and AFNN and a past contributor to RedState, Newsmax, and
Bongino.com
. Her articles have appeared on many sites, including RealClearPolitics, MSN, and the Federalist. Please follow Elizabeth on
Twitter
or
LinkedIn
.
