'Non-binary' Ontario male sues health service to cover neo-vagina surgery while leaving his penis intact

The Ontarian suggested that forcing a transition to fully male or female would be akin to "conversion therapy." 

ADVERTISEMENT
Image
Jarryd Jaeger Vancouver, BC
ADVERTISEMENT

A biological male Ontario resident who identifies as non-binary but female dominant is embroiled in a legal battle over their desire to undergo a vaginoplasty operation that would create a neo-vagina while keeping the biological penis intact. 
 
The resident, identified as KS, was told that the procedure would not be covered by the province, however KS has appealed the decision, arguing that the surgery should be covered by taxpayers. 

According to the National Post, KS' request was denied by Ontario's Health Insurance Plan in 2022, who deemed the unorthodox vaginoplasty to be an experimental surgery. 

Such operations are not done in Canada, and as such it would have been performed at the Crane Center for Transgender Surgery in Austin, Texas. In an interview with the National Post, Dr. Curtis Crane said it was not uncommon, and that he does "10 or so a year."  

KS went to Ontario's Health Services Appeal and Review Board and managed to have OHIP's ruling overturned, with the board arguing that vaginoplasties are covered, and that KS' request shouldn't be denied just because it would keep the penis intact. 

Upon receiving the board's decision, in which they noted that they were abiding by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health's recommendation that "customized surgical requests" should be abided by in the name of "gender-affirming" care, OHIP appealed to Ontario's Superior Court of Justice, which heard the case in February. 

"It is very important for [KS]  to have a vagina for her personal interpretation of her gender expression but she also wishes to maintain her penis,” KS' doctor wrote to OHIP, arguing that the resident is "transfeminine but not completely on the 'feminine' end of the spectrum [and] for this reason it's important for her to have a vagina while maintaining a penis." 
 
KS wished to keep the penis for sexual purposes, as well as to avoid urological complications associated with a traditional vaginoplasty. 

The Ontarian suggested that forcing a transition to fully male or female would be akin to "conversion therapy."

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in to comment

Comments

Powered by StructureCMS™ Comments

Join and support independent free thinkers!

We’re independent and can’t be cancelled. The establishment media is increasingly dedicated to divisive cancel culture, corporate wokeism, and political correctness, all while covering up corruption from the corridors of power. The need for fact-based journalism and thoughtful analysis has never been greater. When you support The Post Millennial, you support freedom of the press at a time when it's under direct attack. Join the ranks of independent, free thinkers by supporting us today for as little as $1.

Support The Post Millennial

Remind me next month

To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit our Privacy Policy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
© 2024 The Post Millennial, Privacy Policy | Do Not Sell My Personal Information